If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower 're not as noticeable however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on research that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated the development of skin conditions like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 based on the average over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
Have you ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is due to the power of the transmission of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away your location from the tower.
While what is a safe distance from a cell tower sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people living in close proximity to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas.
But, the study showed that residents who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal, as well as the effects on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.
