If you've ever been through a city and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still create issues for users.
A Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used mobile phone, you probably know that a safe location from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is because the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.
Although what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower may sound like something that's good however, those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For https://globalchallengescollaboration.org/members/sneezelegal5/activity/108233/ , a study conducted in 2014 in India found that those who lived within 50m of cell towers had significant more health issues than those living further far from antennas.
This study found that people who moved into areas farther away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.
This is because the RF radiation utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the most important organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to the limited absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals and the effect of brief bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such, they should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.
Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can increase the risk of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.