If you've ever wandered through a city you might have noticed tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing larger, purpose-built cell towers. Although they're not as visible, they still can cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to human health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because what is a safe distance from a cell tower transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four MW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that the safest distance from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.
While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.
However, this study also revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have revealed that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the most important organ in the human body, and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. They include the incorrect belief that short-term exposures RF radiations are not harmful because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
what is a safe distance from a cell tower ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. As safe distance from cell tower , they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. Particularly it is inconclusive for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.