Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from your 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
The of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the maximum amount of time a person can be exposed to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

However, because  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  transmits at higher frequencies and has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to a wide range of possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure


Have you ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.

While this sounds like something that's good however, people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.

However,  what is a safe distance from a cell tower  found that people who moved to areas that were further from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors as well as other health issues.

This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication can penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin.  https://brask-termansen.hubstack.net/how-far-away-from-a-5g-mobile-structure-should-you-be-1682758267  is important to understand because the skin serves as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections caused by pathogenic microorganisms and the entry of harmful substances. The skin is the largest organ of the human body. It is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. This includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect on the body of short bursts from pulsed RF waves. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be used for health protective exposure guidelines.

Furthermore there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to determine the degree of exposure to RF radiation. In particular it is inconclusive when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin conditions like acne.