If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe distance that a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower can lead to various possible harms, like the appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the possible harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. https://canvas.instructure.com/eportfolios/2062651/Home/What_lengths_Can_You_Get_Coming_from_a_5G_Portable_Tower_Without_Staying_Unsafe is because the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further your location from the tower.
While this sounds like a good idea, the reality is that those living close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Another study has shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that radiofrequency radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer of skin. It is vital to be aware of this since the skin functions as a protective barrier against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. This includes the false assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF parts of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
In what is a safe distance from a cell tower to that, ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their radiation limits for local peak SARs that are based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to an increased risk of negative health consequences. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.