Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell System?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from the 5G cell System?

If you've ever walked through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy that is taken up by tissues. It is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, calculated over one gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Due to the possible severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general maximum power density of four mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and never exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  is due to the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further away the tower is.

While it sounds like a good idea however, people living in close proximity to towers could be more susceptible to health issues. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were away from the antennas.



However, this study also found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used for wireless communication, has the ability to be absorbed by the body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin acts as a shield against injury to the body, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as the entry of harmful substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. This includes the false assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current knowledge of the biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore,  https://www.theversed.com/members/groundlink9/activity/3548316/  should not be considered for health protection exposure standards.

In addition there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool for determining the level of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation with other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic effects.  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower  can lead to an increased risk of adverse health effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may increase the risk of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.