Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Are usually safest distance from a 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.


It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to human health.

The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a gram of tissue.

But, since  https://notes.io/qNxCS  operates at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This could result in various possible harms, such as an increase in formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for severe effects of 5g radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the peak SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers may actually be more vulnerable to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who were distance from them.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the body's outer layer of skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ of the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds depend on several assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. They include the false belief that exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption is also ignoring the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation, and thus they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum radiation limits for local peak SARs based on the peak spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a sufficient dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to RF radiation. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents , such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts.  https://rasmussen-durham.blogbright.net/what-lengths-can-you-proceed-from-your-5g-portable-tower-without-getting-unsafe  would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For  what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower , exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.